When Governor Raimondo first unveiled her cost projections to support placing tolls on trucks, the 6/10 Connector repair was estimated at $800 million with new bus lanes adding some $300 million of that cost. Director Alviti says that’s a minor marginal addition. We’d hate to see a major change.
Is there really a need for a dedicated bus lane? Representative Morgan, at the House Finance Hearing on Toll legislation, tried to inquire about the assessment that surely was commissioned to support such a need. However, Chairman Gallison shut her down before she could pose that question to Director Alviti. But we digress. . .
Now, under the new grand design of Disneyland-style bridges and tunnels, all capped off with green space created to put a soft edge on a hard plan, DOT claims it won’t cost much more. These are the same folks who suggest close to doubling the cost is a marginal increase. And they are rushing off to Washington chasing what is a rigged federal highway grant for another $150 million. What kind of fools do they take us for.
It wouldn’t be the first time transportation officials low-balled a controversial project: The Massachusetts Big Dig was originally estimated to cost $2.8 billion. Just last year, a final tally put the cost at $21 billion, 7 times the original estimate. A 2015 Boston.com article cited a Boston University associate professor as saying that “engineers knew the original projections were far too low, but politicians covered up their actual estimates. They told everybody who would listen, including politicians, and those people kept it quiet.” Do you have confidence that our elected leaders are providing us with their best estimate?
The Larger The Project, The Greater The Risks.
If the federal government is paying for 60% of the 6/10 ‘Big Dig’ and the DOT incurs cost overruns of just 10%, that means an extra $100 million. Will the federal government fork over $60 million more for overruns or will the RI taxpayers pick up that entire additional $100 million? Imagine if the costs were to double, another $1 billion?
They Want You On Their Side, But Don’t Want Your Input.
To make us feel that we are part of the process, the DOT set out to provide the appearance of public input on the reparations needed for the 6/10 Connector bridges. But review the few seconds of an exchange at the Warwick public workshop for yourself. It reveals the underlying hostility to plans on which the DOT has already decided. Under scrutiny from one elderly gentleman, DOT Director Alviti shows his ‘receptiveness’ to public input with a finger pointing declaration of, “… .Let me tell you something pal” .
And therein lies the problem with RI government - they know best, citizens have no place in the decision making process and if they think they do, they will be bullied into submission. Is this what you consider transparency?
Open Mind or Open Wallet
As they rush forward in this sham grant process -- without a friendly face or supportive voice in the room at these public workshops -- Director Alviti has begun to insist that nothing is cast in stone. All alternatives will be considered. But the night before, in an interview with Channel 10’s Brian Crandall, Alviti all but said that a true Boulevard will not work. It looks like he prefers to open DOTs wallet rather than its minds.
Of course there are questions about how the traffic would be diverted if a less expensive, true boulevard were to replace the 6/10 Connector but that conversation should be had. Brian Bishop, opponent of the ‘Big Dig’, explains that twenty years ago, the Connector didn’t even tie in to Route 95 and traffic managed. Certainly, RI’s population has not grown and in fact, has been stagnant for some time.
But Director Alviti has not seriously considered this. His department staff at the workshops have no grasp on how to find traffic counts from 1990 to see how traffic moved before the 6/10 connector. And Alviti comes to Providence to discuss this project and has never heard of the Olneyville Circulator, the local plan to help surface traffic around Olneyville in which DOT participated! The plans for the Boulevard coordinate perfectly with that approach. And other local road improvements including left turn lanes and traffic management techniques, in as much as a five mile radius around the connector, as well as much less expensive transit augmentation, factor strongly in imagining how traffic would respond to the true Boulevard proposal. And to top off the lack of integrated thinking, DOT plans the northbound viaduct independently and without contemplating savings that could be achieved by eliminating the cost and congestion of rebuilding the northbound 6/10 interchange at Route 95.
Illustrating how little stock the department puts in alternatives, the Director couldn’t even bring forward an estimate for the cost savings for the half-hearted depiction of the true Boulevard he did present. Somehow DOT and Director Alviti devoted untold resources to creating a Disneyland plan for the 6/10 connector in a couple of weeks to present at these workshops, and with the ink barely dry, says he knows what this boondoggle will cost. But they haven’t looked seriously at the cost of a true Boulevard plan.
How about a Rhode Map for Rhode Works
And we don’t trust them to look seriously at the true Boulevard option. The Director has already said a true Boulevard is not up to the task, so can he be trusted to work hard on that alternative and not to inflate those estimates while minimizing those for his preferred plan? DOT cannot be tasked to plan this alternative because they don’t believe in it. Rather the governor should ask Statewide Planning (in the Department of Administration) to formulate and coordinate advancing a Boulevard alternative and provide the resources needed from DOT.
That’s right, Statewide Planning, they of the Rhode Map RI controversy, so eager to plan in our back yards, yet when a real question of public planning arises they have no voice. Apparently, it wasn’t politically expedient to question the extravagant approach to the 6/10 Connector when its cost was being used to justify tolls.
The outcome will ultimately be a combination of local and state political will, but perhaps playing out in the ‘courtroom’ of the Federal Highway Administration which must enter a “Record of Decision” for this project. These approaches must each have strong institutional advocates in that process. Despite our disagreements with Statewide Planning in the past, what is a more logical locus for considering alternatives to such a vast commitment of our resources?
Further, Director Alviti has continually said the billion dollar plan only covers 7 bridges in the 6/10 interchange itself, not the connector to 95! That’s another boondoggle waiting to happen.
For comparison, the IWay, that stretch that comprises the mile and a half stretch of I-195 and the mile stretch of I-95, includes 14 new bridges, one with an 8-lane mainline bridge, 25 lane-miles of new interstate, a new interchange with I-95, five miles of new city streets, 4,100 feet of new pedestrian river walks, and to boot, the bridge itself was floated down 12 miles of the bay. And this system of bridges and highways helps move 160,000 vehicles from the East Bay and eastern Massachusetts, to Boston and points north and to Connecticut and New York and points south.
According to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) that project only cost $610 million and that was to help 160,000 vehicles travel across the bridge daily. We've heard of inflation, but we've also heard of inflated ambition. Can RI really justify creating a road/bridge/tunnel system that costs $1 billion for regional convenience that may not even be the most convenient solution?
You Do Have A Voice.
While many people feel they do not have a voice, recognize that your voice was heard after the roll out of “Cooler & Warmer”. Let your voice be heard again. Contact Governor Raimondo and let her know how you feel about the 6/10 ‘Big Dig’.
Related Slideshow: RI Truck Tolls Controversy—2016
The 2015 Rhode Island General Assembly adjourned after an 11th hour effort to approve truck tolls to pay for a $500 million infrastructure bond fell flat, despite being approved by the Senate.
Opposition to the proposal gained momentum during the summer and fall months in 2015, and the 2016 General Assembly session began with an anti-toll rally immediately before the body convened.
Here are some of the most important developments that have occurred since over 100 people turned out at the Rhode Island State House in opposition to tolls on January 5, 2016.
On Thursday January 21, a number of truckers circled the Rhode Island State House in opposition to truck tolls -- but the members of the Rhode Island Independent Contractors and Associates were also countering what the Rhode Island Trucking Association (RITA) put forth to increase fees -- and the diesel tax -- in order to provide some revenue to the state in lieu of taxes.
"Let's get people back to work, take a look at pay-go, and with respect to those opposed to the diesel tax -- RI truckers are ranked 29th in fees that they pay," said Bill Fischer with RITA. "We're saying we're middle of the pack. It's not as though we're third in the country in fees. There's room for legislative increase on the diesel tax and registration fees. We didn't go [Thursday] because we don't believe the solution lies in not bringing anything to the table."
Groups including the RI Center for Freedom and Prosperity continue to push for Rhode Islanders to contact legislators on the toll issue. The group shared the following on the StopTollsRI.com
SPEAK OUT: CONTACT YOUR LEGISLATORS IMMEDIATELY TO STOP TOLLS
You have the power to stop tolls in Rhode Island. Below you will find a letter that will automatically be sent to your state senator and representative.
Fill out the form and click the send button, time is running out to stop tolls. Speak out to immediately send a powerful message to our elected officials. Don't delay, act now. Your representatives will listen to you!
Concerned about the number of proposals to pay for the repair and replacement of the state’s infrastructure, Sen. Leonidas P. Raptakis (D-Dist. 33, Coventry, West Greenwich, East Greenwich) said "it’s time for the state to take a timeout to sift through all the information it has been inundated with."
The release for the General Assembly said the following:
He has submitted a resolution that would create a special legislative commission to study and review all aspects of future tolling of motor vehicles in the state.
The commission would be tasked with making a comprehensive study and analysis of all aspects of future motor vehicle tolling including, but not limited to, automobiles, tractor trailers and other commercial vehicles.
The Hassenfeld Institute for Public Leadership released its quarterly survey on key issues facing the State. The poll first asked respondents if they favored or opposed several proposals for bridge and road repair. On proposals to put tolls in place to help fund repairs:
• 43.9% favor Governor Raimondo’s proposal to assess a toll on large trucks to pay for the $1 Billion in revenue bonds to fix the roads and bridges; while 49.4% said they oppose the plan.
• 37.7% favor an alternative “pay as you go” plan, that could still include tolls but avoid interest payments, while 51.9% said they oppose the plan.
The RI GOP weighed in on the poll.
In September 2015, Bryant University's Hassenfeld Institute conducted a poll which showed that the voters supported new tolls by a margin of 53 to 44. But, today as voters have learned more about the plan, the numbers have flipped and now voters are against new tolls by a margin of 49 to 44, a swing of 14 percent.
At the same time, the Hassenfeld Institute poll showed 58 percent of the voters support reallocating money from the state's budget to fix the roads and bridges. Reallocating existing revenues within the budget instead of creating new revenue sources to fix our bridges has been the position championed by Republicans since the beginning of this debate in June 2015.
StopTollsRI.Com Says 75% of RI’s Legislators Refuse To Go On Record About Highly Controversial Toll Proposal
Toll opponents StopTollsRI.com distributed a survey to all Rhode Island legislators. It consisted of one question: "Do you unequivocally oppose new tolls of any kind?"
"That simple question was left unanswered by 75% of all legislators," said StopTollsRI.
“Voters and taxpayers have the right to know where their legislators stand on any issue, but particularly on a highly controversial issue like tolls”, says StopTollsRI.com’s spokesperson Monique Chartier. “The silence is deafening on this critical question."
RI Trucking Association Releases Letter Sent to Raimondo by the American Trucking Associations (ATA) in Virginia
RITA President Chris Maxwell had asked the ATA to review correspondence and media statements related to toll enforcement by both Governor Raimondo and Colonel O’Donnell of the Rhode Island State Police.
“I can assure every member of the General Assembly that the opinions and statements issued by the governor related to toll enforcement have raised major concerns in both the trucking industry and the business community,” said Maxwell. “There are federal laws in place that provide truckers the right to access local roadways. The governor has raised an issue and not provided any details of how this enforcement plan would work. At this juncture, we are very concerned about any plan that may interrupt the flow of commerce or add greater burdens and cost to the trucking industry.”
“It is fair to ask how a Rhode Island trooper is expected to know when a truck is purposely diverting a toll and when they are getting off the highway to make a delivery – or quite frankly just going home. We intend to fight any legislative initiative that will create a police state for the trucking industry,” added Maxwell.
Independent House District 36 Representative Blake Filippi (Block Island, Charlestown, South Kingstown and Westerly) joined with the Republican Policy Group to introduce legislation calling on voters to amend the R.I. Constitution to require statewide and local voter approval for any new passenger vehicle tolls. Representatives Morgan, Price, Chippendale, Roberts and Reilly are cosponsors of H-7191.
“The Governor’s proposed Rhode Works toll gantries will stand as monuments to inefficiency and a failure to do right by the People – and we are adamantly opposed to this plan. However, if the State is going to establish a statewide network of toll gantries, R.I. families deserve protection from a future government in a cash crunch. Although our leaders have assured us that the proposed network of gantries will never be used to toll passenger vehicles, these gantries will remain standing long after they leave office, and future leaders are not bound by these promises,” said Filippi.
“The Governor has asked for a viable and sustainable alternative to her Toll proposal. We [are] introducing the Republican No Tolls Bridgeworks plan in both the House of Representatives and the Senate,” stated Representative Patricia Morgan. “At the same time, we will hand deliver a copy of the legislation to her office. Hopefully, now that it is in official form, she will review its merits and work to help Rhode Island, not hurt the state with tolls.”
The GOP issued the following release:
"When the Governor abruptly introduced her massive borrowing and tolling scheme at the end of last year’s legislative session, the Republican Policy Group knew tolls would have detrimental consequences for Rhode Islanders. Our hard working families are fighting a stagnant economy and increase expenses. They simply should not be asked to bear the burden of higher consumer goods, because our State’s political leaders are unwilling to prioritize bridge repair over corporate welfare and waste,” she continued.
The Republican Policy Group searched the budget for spending that could be used for bridge repair that, at the same time, did not touch social programs or vital services. “Our budget is $8.7 million. Reallocating less than 1% of existing revenue for the next 10 years to bridge repair will raise $255 million more than the Governor’s plan,” explained Morgan. “That means in the same time frame, we will have more bridges repaired and more jobs created. The Republican plan surpasses the beneficial parts of the Governor’s plan, while, at the same time, avoiding the damage of tolls."
StopTollsRI.com Condemns "Deceptive Push Poll about Tolls Conducted by AAA"
Stop Tolls said that, "AAA Northeast released the results of a poll that appeared to show that a simple majority of their Rhode Island members supports Governor Gina Raimondo's truck toll proposal. However, the poll questions were not released with the results."
A release from NoTolls said the following:
AAA members themselves circulated the questions to the press, at which point, their bias was evident. It appears that this is a push poll designed simply to carry the Governor's side of the debate. As the R.I. Trucking Association has correctly pointed out, unfortunately, the state's largest business association, the Providence Chamber of Commerce, is an agent of the Governor and not necessarily working on behalf of the business community. The Providence Chamber appears to be orchestrating this via AAA (which is otherwise a very good and reliable business.)
"The results of the survey are misleading because it was crafted in a way to just get drivers to respond to the need to fix the roads, which is not in dispute. That's very different from asking respondents to weigh in on the financial and long term implications of tolls, not to mention important alternatives like pay-as-you-go", says StopTollsRI.com spokesperson Monique Chartier. "They are portraying these poll results as "Drivers approve of the RhodeWorks Truck Tolls Plan" - this is deceptive and misleading spin."
Could Toll Technology Be Used for Monitoring Drivers’ Data?
Opponents to truck tolls in Rhode Island are questioning the tracking capacities of the gantries, in light of other states using E-ZPass to issue speeding tickets and engage in data monitoring activities as discovered by the ACLU.
“While our primary concern is to stop the government from creating a new revenue stream from the taxpayer, of course we are concerned as average citizens that more of our basic rights might be stripped from us,” said Pam Gencarella with OSTPA.
RI Trucking Assoc: "Independent Analysis Points to Flaws in Economic Impact Study on RhodeWorks"
The Rhode Island Trucking Association (RITA) released an analysis of an economic impact study of RhodeWorks and concluded the study is flawed. The governor previously released the economic impact study (REMI Report) last October and used it as a foundation to build support for her toll plan.
The release was as follows:
The analysis of the REMI report was conducted by IHS, a leading analytics and information company, which operates in 32 countries around the world. The IHS team reviewed “The Economic Impact of RhodeWorks: An Accelerated Transportation Restoration Plan”, prepared by REMI. Their review identified several key issues in the report where assumptions and approaches to the study may lead to erroneous or suspect conclusions. Additionally, they found that the REMI study is sorely lacking in transparency. Key issues identified by IHS include:
*The IHS study projects revenue from tolls will only generate $24 million to $37.5 million per year, substantially below RhodeWorks’ $60 million per year projection.
* Highway truck volumes used in the REMI report appear questionable.
*The REMI report did not adequately account for truck routing diversion potential around the state.
* Not enough consideration was given to financing alternatives, which did not include bridge tolling.
StopTollsRI.com Calls Upon Governor to "Stop Stonewalling on APRA Request and Release Administration’s Own Truck Diversion Study"
StopTollsRI.com called upon Governor Raimondo to release a key study associated with her truck tolls plan concerning projections of truck diversion of highway toll gantries.
"The Governor has thus far stonewalled on releasing her own authorized truck diversion study, but in the wake of a survey recently released by the RI Trucking Association (conducted by the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association), StopTollsRI.com believes the release of the state sponsored survey is urgent.
Representative Patricia Morgan, a staunch critic of the truck tolls plan, submitted an APRA request to see the diversion study and it was originally denied, along with her request for toll gantry locations. After significant public pressure, the Raimondo administration last week provided the toll gantry locations, but this important study, which covered likely diversion routes truckers could use to avoid the tolls, remains inaccessible to the public. StopTollsRI.com believes the Governor’s motivation in refusing to release all of the data is due to findings that would indicate there would be a significant amount of diversion around the toll gantries."
RI DOT Releases Proposed Gantry Locations -- Days After Letter Was Sent to Leadership
Wrote the RI DOT:
With the recent release of the preliminary tolling locations, we look forward to the final resolution of the RhodeWorks financing plan and passage by the Legislature. This will clear the way for us to begin rebuilding our roads and bridges, aiding in the economic revival of this state.
RI Trucking Association Releases Driver Survey Conducted by the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA)
OOIDA surveyed its membership in Rhode Island and surrounding states (Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Vermont) using an on-line survey. 373 OOIDA members who regularly travel through and in Rhode Island responded to the survey.
"The purpose was to determine how truck drivers, in particular truck drivers that are likely to operate in Rhode Island, feel about Governor Raimondo’s proposal. The survey was available on the OOIDA website and was open to respondents for a period of roughly eleven days." The survey found:
76.7% of the respondents indicated they would alter their route to avoid paying tolls in Rhode Island.
60.6% of the respondents indicated they alter their route to avoid tolls in other states.
GOP Claims Victory Over Tolls with Special Election Win
The special election in Senate District 11 was "a special night for Rhode Island taxpayers," said the RI GOP:
John Pagliarini did not just defeat a well-known Democrat who has served for more than a decade on the town council of a community that constitutes about 66% of the district, he also defeated a candidate personally endorsed by Governor Gina Raimondo.
Chairman Brandon S. Bell declared: "By electing Pagliarini to the Senate, the voters sent a simple message by special delivery via a huge 18 wheeler truck to State House insiders: NO TOLLS!
The special election in Senate District 11 was a special night for Rhode Island taxpayers. John Pagliarini did not just defeat a well-known Democrat who has served for more than a decade on the town council of a community that constitutes about 66% of the district, he also defeated a candidate personally endorsed by Governor Gina Raimondo.
Chairman Brandon S. Bell declared: "By electing Pagliarini to the Senate, the voters sent a simple message by special delivery via a huge 18 wheeler truck to State House insiders: NO TOLLS
Over one hundred opponents to truck tolls took to the State House on Tuesday for a press conference — and a rally — to express their concerns for Governor Raimondo’s funding mechanism to support a $500 million infrastructure bond.
Over a dozen groups including RI Taxpayers, Ocean State Taxpayers in Action (OSTPA), and the Rhode Island Center for Freedom and Prosperity turned out for a speaker series that included Republican Deputy Minority Leader Patricia Morgan, former Director of Administration Gary Sasse, RI Taxpayers' Larry Fitzmorris, and Sakonnet Toll Opposition Platform's (STOP) Tony Viveiros.
“In 2011, DOT said they couldn't fix our roads and bridges because interest payments on all the transportation bonds were consuming too much of their funding. The General Assembly attempted to fix that funding problem by creating a savings account dedicated for infrastructure spending,” said Morgan
